饮食质量和吸烟对高血压中风心血管疾病和全因死亡率的影响

AbstractThisstudyaimedtoexaminetheinteractionbetweendietqualityindices(DQIs)andsmokingontheincidenceofhypertension(HTN),stroke,cardiovasculardiseases,andall-causemortality.Weprospectivelyfollowed5720participantsandcollecteddietarydataviaavalidatedfoodfrequencyquestionnairetocalculateDQI-international(DQI-I)andDQI-revised(DQI-R).

摘要本研究旨在探讨饮食质量指数(DQIs)与吸烟对高血压(HTN),中风,心血管疾病和全因死亡率的相互作用。我们前瞻性地跟踪了5720名参与者,并通过经过验证的食物频率问卷收集了饮食数据,以计算DQI国际(DQI-I)和DQI修订版(DQI-R)。

Consideringaninteractionanalysis,weclassifiedparticipantsbasedondietquality(median:higher/lower)andsmokingstatus.Over9yearsoffollow-up,higherdietqualityscoreswereassociatedwithalowerriskofstrokeandmortality.WhilecurrentsmokershadahigherriskofstrokeandmortalitybuthadalowerriskofdevelopingHTN.

Comparedtothecurrentsmokerswithlowerdietquality,nonsmokerswithhigherdietqualityaccordingtotheDQI-I[HR0.24;95%CI(0.08,0.66)],andDQI-R[HR0.20;95%CI(0.07,0.57)]hadalowerriskofstroke.Moreover,thelowerriskofmortalitywasmoreevidentinnonsmokerswithhigherDQI-I[HR0.40;95%CI(0.22–0.75)]andDQI-Rscores[HR0.34;95%CI(0.18–0.63)]comparedtononsmokerswithlowerdietquality.

与目前饮食质量较低的吸烟者相比,根据DQI-I[HR0.24;95%CI(0.08,0.66)]和DQI-R[HR0.20;95%CI(0.07,0.57)],饮食质量较高的非吸烟者中风风险较低。此外,与饮食质量较低的非吸烟者相比,DQI-I[HR0.40;95%CI(0.22-0.75)]和DQI-R评分[HR0.34;95%CI(0.18-0.63)]较高的非吸烟者死亡率较低。

WhilehigherDQI-IandDQI-Rscoreswereassociatedwithalowerriskofstrokeandmortality,thisbeneficialeffectmaybenegatedbysmoking..

IntroductionNon-communicablediseases(NCDs),particularlycardiovasculardiseases(CVDs),representthepredominantglobalcauseofmortality1.IranhasahighprevalencerateofCVD(>9000casesper100,000individuals),accountingforalmosthalfofthemortalitiesandcontributingto20–23%oftheoveralldiseaseburden2.

引言非传染性疾病(NCDs),特别是心血管疾病(CVDs),是全球死亡的主要原因1。伊朗的心血管疾病患病率很高(>每100000人中有9000例),几乎占死亡率的一半,占整体疾病负担的20-23%2。

Notably,hypertension(HTN)hasemergedastheleadingcontributortoCVDsincidence,affectingoneineveryfourIranians3,4.Whilesmokingandpoordietarerecognizedastheprimarycontributorstomortalityrisk5,ithasbeenshownthatCVDscanbemanagedthroughdietaryandlifestylebehaviors6,7.Smokingcontributestonearly25%ofannualstrokeincidentsandapproximately15%ofstroke-relatedmortality8,9.

Cigarettesmokinghasapronouncedeffectonmales,adultsrangingfrom18to44yearsold,individualswithlowersocioeconomicstatus,andresidentsofdevelopingnations10,11.EvidencesuggeststhatsmokerswithpoorernutritionalstatushaveatwofoldhigherriskofdevelopingCVDs12,13.Smokersoftenadoptunhealthydietaryhabits,likelowerintakeoffruitsandvegetablesandhigherconsumptionoffatsandalcohol14,15.

吸烟对男性,18至44岁的成年人,社会经济地位较低的个体以及发展中国家的居民有显着影响10,11。有证据表明,营养状况较差的吸烟者患心血管疾病的风险高出两倍[12,13]。吸烟者经常采取不健康的饮食习惯,如水果和蔬菜的摄入量较低,脂肪和酒精的摄入量较高14,15。

Themutuallyinfluencingdisease-causingmechanismscommontobothsmokingandpoordietqualitycaninteractprogressively,indicatingthehigherpotentialriskofNCDsovertime16.Meanwhile,theoptimalmethodforconsideringassociationsandinteractionsamongdietarycomponentsistoassessoveralldietquality17.

Dietaryqualityindices(DQIs)offerathoroughapproachtoassessingdietarybehaviorswithanemphasisondietaryvariety,dietarymoderation,balancednutrientintake,anddiversefoodchoices18.Severalstudieshaveindividuallyexaminedtheimpactofdietaryfactorsorsmokingonhealthrisks.S.

饮食质量指数(DQIs)提供了一种全面的方法来评估饮食行为,重点是饮食多样性,饮食适度性,均衡的营养摄入和多样化的食物选择18。一些研究分别研究了饮食因素或吸烟对健康风险的影响。S。

Table1Baselinecharacteristicsofthestudyparticipantsforcardiovasculardiseaseincidentsandall-causemortalitybasedondietqualityandsmokingstatus(n=5048).FullsizetableSupplementaryTableS1displaysthebaselinecharacteristicsofthestudyparticipantsrecruitedforthestudyofHTN.

表1基于饮食质量和吸烟状况的研究参与者心血管疾病事件和全因死亡率的基线特征(n=5048)。全尺寸表补充表S1显示了为HTN研究招募的研究参与者的基线特征。

Themeanage±SDoftheparticipant'sagewas38.25years,and42.6%weremen.Thetotalpopulationhadthemean±SDofDQI-IandDQI-Rof62.43±8.03and70.00±12.81,respectively.ConsideringtheDQI-IandDQI-R,participantswithhigherdietquality,hadahigherpercentageofmen,highermeanageandBMI,higherphysicalactivityandeducationlevel,higherenergyintake,andexhibitedhigherlevelsofFBS,TC,TG,andSBP.

平均年龄±参与者年龄的SD为38.25岁,男性为42.6%。总人口的平均值±DQI-I和DQI-R的SD为62.43±8.03和70.00±分别为12.81。考虑到DQI-I和DQI-R,饮食质量较高的参与者男性比例较高,平均年龄和BMI较高,体育锻炼和教育水平较高,能量摄入较高,FBS,TC,TG和SBP水平较高。

AccordingtotheDQI-I,participantswithhigherdietqualityhadalowerHDL-Clevel.Comparedtonon-smokers,currentsmokersweremorelikelytobemale,hadahigherage,higherphysicalactivitylevel,higherlevelsofTC,TG,SBP,andhigherenergyintake,however,theyhadlowerHDL-C,lowerscoresofDQI-Ianditscomponentsincludingvarietyandmoderation,andalsolowerDQI-Rscoreanditsmoderationscore.Afterameanfollow-upof9.0years,357casesofCVDs(7.1%),54casesofstroke(1.1%),and131casesofmortality(2.6%)wereascertained.

根据DQI-I,饮食质量较高的参与者的HDL-C水平较低。与不吸烟者相比,目前吸烟者更可能是男性,年龄更高,体力活动水平更高,TC,TG,SBP水平更高,能量摄入更高,但HDL-C较低,DQI-I及其组成部分(包括多样性和适度性)得分较低,DQI-R得分及其适度得分也较低。平均随访9年后,确定了357例CVD(7.1%),54例中风(1.1%)和131例死亡率(2.6%)。

Also,consideringtheHTNoutcome,1032casesofHTN(18%)wererecordedafterameanfollow-upperiodof7.8years.Ourresultsindicatedtherobustaccuracyofthemultivariablemodelsinpredictingtheincidenceoftheinvestigatedoutcomes.TheHarrel’sCindexscoresfortheassociationsbetweensmokingandHTN(0.792),smokingandstroke(0.880),smokingandCVDs(0.823),smokingandmortality(0.847),DQI-IandHTN(0.791),DQI-Iandstroke(0.895),DQI-IandCVDs(0.823),DQI-Iand.

此外,考虑到HTN的结果,平均随访7.8年后,记录了1032例HTN(18%)。我们的结果表明,多变量模型在预测调查结果发生率方面具有强大的准确性。吸烟与HTN(0.792),吸烟与中风(0.880),吸烟与心血管疾病(0.823),吸烟与死亡率(0.847),DQI-I与HTN(0.791),DQI-I与中风(0.895),DQI-I与心血管疾病(0.823),DQI-I与。

Table2Hazardratio(95%confidenceintervals)forcardiovascularevents,all-causemortality,andhypertensionbasedonthequartilesofdietaryqualityindices.FullsizetableFigure1indicatesthehazardratioforincidenceofCVDs,stroke,mortality,andHTNincurrentsmokerscomparedwithnon-smokers.

表2基于饮食质量指数的四分位数,心血管事件,全因死亡率和高血压的风险比(95%置信区间)。全尺寸表图1显示了当前吸烟者与非吸烟者相比,心血管疾病,中风,死亡率和HTN发病率的风险比。

Inthecrudemodel,theriskofall-causemortalitywassignificantlyhigherinthecurrentsmokersthannon-smokers[HR1.87,95%CI(1.19–2.93)];theassociationremainedsignificantinthefinaladjustedmodel[HR2.11;95%CI(1.30–3.45)].Asignificantlyincreasedriskofstrokewasalsoobservedinthecurrentsmokersthanthenon-smokersafteraccountingforallpotentialcovariates[HR2.32;95%CI(1.06–5.10)].

在粗略模型中,当前吸烟者的全因死亡风险显着高于非吸烟者[HR1.87,95%CI(1.19-2.93)];在最终调整后的模型中,这种关联仍然很显着[HR2.11;95%CI(1.30-3.45)]。考虑到所有潜在的协变量,目前吸烟者的中风风险也比不吸烟者显着增加[HR2.32;95%CI(1.06-5.10)]。

TheriskofHTNwassignificantlylowerinthecurrentsmokerscomparedtonon-smokersinthefullyadjustedmodel[HR0.77;95%CI(0.62–0.96)].Figure1Thehazardratioand95%confidenceinterval(CI)fortheincidenceofhypertension,all-causemortality,strokeandcardiovasculardiseases(CVDs)amongcurrentsmokersvs.

在完全调整后的模型中,当前吸烟者的HTN风险显着低于非吸烟者[HR0.77;95%CI(0.62-0.96)]。图1当前吸烟者中高血压,全因死亡率,中风和心血管疾病(CVD)发病率的风险比和95%置信区间(CI)。

non-smokers(referencegroup):TehranLipidandGlucoseStudy.FullsizeimageTable3displaystheHR(95%CI)forcardiovascularevents,all-causemortality,andHTNbasedonthecombinedeffectsofdietqualityandsmokingstatus.Nosignificantinteraction(Pinteraction>0.05)wasnotedamongthestudiedgroupsconcerningcardiovascularevents,all-causemortality,andHTN.

非吸烟者(参考组):德黑兰脂质和葡萄糖研究。全尺寸图像表3显示了基于饮食质量和吸烟状况的综合影响,心血管事件,全因死亡率和HTN的HR(95%CI)。没有明显的相互作用(P相互作用>在研究组中,关于心血管事件,全因死亡率和HTN,注意到0.05)。

Comparedtocurrentsmokerswithpoordietquality,thehazard(95%CI)ofstrokewas0.23(0.08,0.63)inadjustedmodel1and0.24(0.08,0.66)intheadjustedmodel2innon-smokerswithgooddietqualitybasedonDQI-I.Alowerriskofstrokewasalsoobservedinnon-smokerswithgooddietqualitybasedonDQI-Rcomparedtocurrentsmokerswithpoordi.

与目前饮食质量较差的吸烟者相比,基于DQI-I的饮食质量良好的非吸烟者,调整后模型1的卒中风险(95%CI)为0.23(0.08,0.63),调整后模型2中的卒中风险(95%CI)为0.24(0.08,0.66)。与目前di较差的吸烟者相比,基于DQI-R的饮食质量良好的非吸烟者的卒中风险也较低。

Table3Hazardratio(95%confidenceintervals)forcardiovascularevents,all-causemortality,andhypertensionbasedonthecombinedeffectsofdietqualityandsmokingstatus.FullsizetableDiscussionThecurrentstudyrevealedthatahigh-qualitydietwaslinearlyassociatedwithalowerriskofstrokeandmortality.

Comparedtonon-smokers,currentsmokershadanhigherriskofstroke,CVDs,andmortality,andalowerriskofHTN.Additionally,non-smokerswithhigherdietqualityhadalowerriskofstrokecomparedtocurrentsmokerswithlowerdietquality.Non-smokersexperiencealowerriskofmortalitythancurrentsmokerswithlowerdietquality.

与不吸烟者相比,目前吸烟者患中风,心血管疾病和死亡的风险更高,患HTN的风险更低。此外,与目前饮食质量较低的吸烟者相比,饮食质量较高的非吸烟者中风风险较低。与目前饮食质量较低的吸烟者相比,不吸烟者的死亡风险较低。

Notably,thelowerriskforstrokeandall-causemortalitywasmorepronouncedinnon-smokerswithhigherdietqualitythaninthosewithlowerdietquality.ThesimilaritiesintheassociationsbetweentheDQI-IandtheDQI-Rwiththestudiedoutcomesarelikelyattributabletosimilaritiesintheirfoodandnutrientcomponents.

值得注意的是,饮食质量较高的非吸烟者中风和全因死亡率较低的风险比饮食质量较低的非吸烟者更为明显。DQI-I和DQI-R与研究结果之间关联的相似性可能归因于其食物和营养成分的相似性。

Ingeneral,higherDQI-IandtheDQI-Rscoresindicateahealthierdiet,characterizedbyavarietyoffoodchoices,adequateintakeoffruits,vegetables,grains,andmicronutrients,andsuitablepercentagesoftotalenergyintakefortotalfat,saturatedfats,andhigh-caloriefoods.Additionally,theDQI-Rconsidersmoderationofalcoholconsumption,whichmakesitvaluableinpopulationswherealcoholuseiseitherexcessiveorcontraindicated.

一般来说,较高的DQI-I和DQI-R分数表示更健康的饮食,其特征在于多种食物选择,足够摄入水果,蔬菜,谷物和微量营养素,以及总脂肪,饱和脂肪和高热量食物的总能量摄入量的适当百分比。此外,DQI-R考虑了适度饮酒,这使得它在饮酒过量或禁忌的人群中很有价值。

Althoughbothindicesevaluateanapproximatelyequalnumberofdietarycomponents,theDQI-IencompassesabroaderspectrumofdietaryaspectscomparedtotheDQI-R.IncontrasttotheDQI-R,theDQI-Iassessestheadequacyoffiber,protein,andvitaminCintake,aswellasthebalanceinratiosbetweenmacronutrientsandfattyacids.Despitethel.

虽然这两个指数评估的饮食成分数量大致相等,但与DQI-R相比,DQI-I涵盖了更广泛的饮食方面。与DQI-R相比,DQI-I评估了纤维,蛋白质和维生素C摄入量的充足性,以及常量营养素和脂肪酸之间的比例平衡。尽管l。

Dataavailability

数据可用性

Thedatasetsusedand/oranalyzedduringthecurrentstudyareavailablefromthecorrespondingauthoruponreasonablerequest.

本研究中使用和/或分析的数据集可根据合理要求从通讯作者处获得。

ReferencesAllen,L.etal.Socioeconomicstatusandnon-communicablediseasebehaviouralriskfactorsinlow-incomeandlower-middle-incomecountries:Asystematicreview.LancetGlob.Health5,e277–e289(2017).Article

PubMed

PubMedCentral

公共医学中心

GoogleScholar

谷歌学者

Sarrafzadegan,N.&Mohammmadifard,N.Cardiovasculardiseaseiniraninthelast40years:Prevalence,mortality,morbidity,challengesandstrategiesforcardiovascularprevention.Arch.IranMed.22,204–210(2019).PubMed

Sarrafzadegan,N。&Mohammadifard,N。过去40年伊朗的心血管疾病:患病率,死亡率,发病率,挑战和心血管预防策略。拱门。伊朗医学杂志22204-210(2019)。PubMed出版社

CAS

中科院

Li,Y.,Cao,G.-Y.,Jing,W.-Z.,Liu,J.&Liu,M.Globaltrendsandregionaldifferencesinincidenceandmortalityofcardiovasculardisease,1990–2019:Findingsfrom2019globalburdenofdiseasestudy.Eur.J.Prev.Cardiol.30,276–286(2023).Article

Sun,J.etal.AssociationoftheAmericanHeartAssociation’snew“Life’sEssential8”withall-causeandcardiovasculardisease-specificmortality:Prospectivecohortstudy.BMCMed.21,1–13(2023).Article

Stamler,J.,Rains-Clearman,D.,Lenz-Litzow,K.,Tillotson,J.L.&Grandits,G.A.Relationofsmokingatbaselineandduringtrialyears1–6tofoodandnutrientintakesandweightinthespecialinterventionandusualcaregroupsintheMultipleRiskFactorInterventionTrial.Am.

Stamler,J.,Rains-Clearman,D.,Lenz-Litzow,K.,Tillotson,J.L。&Grandits,G.A。在多风险因素干预试验中,特别干预组和常规护理组中,基线和试验1-6年吸烟与食物和营养素摄入量和体重的关系。上午。

ADS

Kawachi,I.etal.Smokingcessationanddecreasedriskofstrokeinwomen.JAMA269,232–236(1993).Article

Azar,M.&Sarkisian,E.FoodCompositionTableofIran:NationalNutritionandFoodResearchInstitute(ShaheedBeheshtiUniversity,1980).

Azar,M。和Sarkisian,E。伊朗食品成分表:国家营养与食品研究所(ShaheedBeheshti大学,1980)。

Momenan,A.A.etal.ReliabilityandvalidityoftheModifiableActivityQuestionnaire(MAQ)inanIranianurbanadultpopulation.Arch.IranMed.15,279–282(2012).PubMed

Momenan,A.A.等人,《可修改活动问卷(MAQ)在伊朗城市成年人群中的信度和效度》。拱门。伊朗医学杂志15279-282(2012)。PubMed出版社

Harrell,F.E.Jr.,Califf,R.M.,Pryor,D.B.,Lee,K.L.&Rosati,R.A.Evaluatingtheyieldofmedicaltests.JAMA247,2543–2546(1982).Article

DownloadreferencesAcknowledgementsWeexpressourgratitudetotheparticipantsintheTLGSfortheirenthusiasticsupportandacknowledgethevaluableassistanceprovidedbythestaffoftheResearchInstituteforEndocrineSciences,TLGSunit.FundingThisworkwasfundedbytheIranUniversityofMedicalSciences,Tehran,Iran.

下载参考文献致谢我们感谢TLGS参与者的热情支持,并感谢TLGS内分泌科学研究所工作人员提供的宝贵帮助。资助这项工作由伊朗德黑兰的伊朗医科大学资助。

Thisgranthasbeenawardedforcompletionofamaster'sthesis.AuthorinformationAuthorsandAffiliationsNutritionandEndocrineResearchCenter,ResearchInstituteforEndocrineSciences,ShahidBeheshtiUniversityofMedicalSciences,Tehran,IranMostafaNorouzzadeh,FarshadTeymoori,HosseinFarhadnejad,NazaninMoslehi&ParvinMirmiranDepartmentofNutrition,SchoolofPublicHealth,IranUniversityofMedicalSciences,Tehran,IranMostafaNorouzzadeh,FarshadTeymoori&SeyedehTayebehRahidehEndocrineResearchCenter,ResearchInstituteforEndocrineSciences,ShahidBeheshtiUniversityofMedicalSciences,Tehran,IranFereidounAziziAuthorsMostafaNorouzzadehViewauthorpublicationsYoucanalsosearchforthisauthorin.

该笔赠款用于完成硕士论文。作者信息作者和附属机构德黑兰沙希德·贝赫什蒂医科大学内分泌科学研究所营养与内分泌研究中心,伊朗国家医学院,伊朗国家医学院,伊朗国家医学院,伊朗国家医学院,伊朗国家医学院,伊朗国家医学院,伊朗国家医学院,伊朗国家医学院,伊朗国家医学院,伊朗国家医学院,伊朗国家医学院NorouzzadehView作者出版物您也可以在中搜索此作者。

PubMedGoogleScholarFarshadTeymooriViewauthorpublicationsYoucanalsosearchforthisauthorin

PubMedGoogleScholarFarshadTeymooriView作者出版物您也可以在

PubMedGoogleScholarHosseinFarhadnejadViewauthorpublicationsYoucanalsosearchforthisauthorin

PubMedGoogleScholarHosseinFarhadnejadView作者出版物您也可以在

PubMedGoogleScholarNazaninMoslehiViewauthorpublicationsYoucanalsosearchforthisauthorin

PubMedGoogleScholarNazaninMoslehiView作者出版物您也可以在

PubMedGoogleScholarSeyedehTayebehRahidehViewauthorpublicationsYoucanalsosearchforthisauthorin

PubMedGoogleScholarSeyedehTayebehRahidehView作者出版物您也可以在

PubMedGoogleScholarParvinMirmiranViewauthorpublicationsYoucanalsosearchforthisauthorin

PubMedGoogleScholarParvinMirminanView作者出版物您也可以在

PubMedGoogleScholarFereidounAziziViewauthorpublicationsYoucanalsosearchforthisauthorin

PubMedGoogleScholarFereidounAziziView作者出版物您也可以在

PubMedGoogleScholarContributionsM.N.:Conceptualization,Methodology,Formalanalysis,Investigation,Writing—OriginalDraftF.T.:Methodology,Formalanalysis,Validation,InvestigationH.F.N.:Investigation,Writing—Review&EditingN.M.:Investigation,Writing—Review&EditingS.T.R.:Conceptualization,SupervisionP.M.:Resources,ProjectadministrationF.A.:Resources,Projectadministration.CorrespondingauthorsCorrespondenceto.

SeyedehTayebehRahidehorParvinMirmiran.Ethicsdeclarations

SeyedehTayebehRahideh或ParvinMirmiran。道德宣言

Competinginterests

相互竞争的利益

Theauthorsdeclarenocompetinginterests.

SupplementaryInformationSupplementaryInformation.Rightsandpermissions

补充信息补充信息。权限和权限

OpenAccessThisarticleislicensedunderaCreativeCommonsAttribution4.0InternationalLicense,whichpermitsuse,sharing,adaptation,distributionandreproductioninanymediumorformat,aslongasyougiveappropriatecredittotheoriginalauthor(s)andthesource,providealinktotheCreativeCommonslicence,andindicateifchangesweremade.

Theimagesorotherthirdpartymaterialinthisarticleareincludedinthearticle'sCreativeCommonslicence,unlessindicatedotherwiseinacreditlinetothematerial.Ifmaterialisnotincludedinthearticle'sCreativeCommonslicenceandyourintendeduseisnotpermittedbystatutoryregulationorexceedsthepermitteduse,youwillneedtoobtainpermissiondirectlyfromthecopyrightholder.

ReprintsandpermissionsAboutthisarticleCitethisarticleNorouzzadeh,M.,Teymoori,F.,Farhadnejad,H.etal.Theinteractionbetweendietqualityandcigarettesmokingontheincidenceofhypertension,stroke,cardiovasculardiseases,andall-causemortality.

转载和许可本文引用本文Norouzzadeh,M.,Teymoori,F.,Farhadnejad,H。等人。饮食质量与吸烟之间的相互作用对高血压,中风,心血管疾病和全因死亡率的影响。

ProvidedbytheSpringerNatureSharedItcontent-sharinginitiative

由SpringerNatureSharedIt内容共享计划提供

CommentsBysubmittingacommentyouagreetoabidebyourTermsandCommunityGuidelines.Ifyoufindsomethingabusiveorthatdoesnotcomplywithourtermsorguidelinespleaseflagitasinappropriate.

THE END
1.食品调查问卷问卷调查模板这是一种了解消费者对食品安全、口味和营养成分的看法的调查,以便食品生产商和销售商改进产品和服务,满足市场需求。http://wj.wtc.edu.cn/libt/10209.aspx
2.降生活追逐活力深度剖析关于降饮食的问卷调查综上所述,“关于健康饮食的问卷调查”不仅让我们更加清楚地认识到了当前人们在这个方面所面临的问题,也为改善我们的生活方式指明了方向。通过不断提升自身对营养学知识,并培养正确的心态,我们相信每个人的生活质量都会得到显著提升,为实现一个更加美好的未来打下坚实基础。https://www.chuutacua.cn/shi-cai-da-quan/831224.html
3.Springboot食物营养数据分析系统fe78b本项目旨在通过数字化手段,优化食品营养管理流程,提高营养分析的准确性和便捷性,为公众提供科学、合理的膳食指导。我们计划开发一套基于Springboot框架的食物营养数据分析系统,该系统将涵盖用户管理、食材分类、热卖食材展示、美食类型划分、美食食谱提供、营养数据查询与分析以及美食资讯发布等多个模块。 https://blog.csdn.net/ck3027/article/details/144220381
4.2025注册营养(技)师考点(思维导图版)2.3各类常见食物及营养特点【考试大纲】模块一 食物与营养 2.食物营养 2.3 各类常见食物及营养特点-谷类、薯类及杂豆类 2025年注册营养(技)师考试【备考交流群】已开放 【进群免费领取全套思维导图】 扫码添加客服 入群交流 2025年注册营养师/技师考试备考提https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzUyNzk1MDY1OA==&mid=2247527599&idx=1&sn=b29569a608ba156219fc49b910112706&chksm=fa759a82cd0213943e638e0f85ebe5f46983ac39be4ea134c9ce851c444996c01e7d2106d89d&scene=27
5.辅助参照食物图谱让膳食调查结果更可靠辅助参照食物图谱 让膳食调查结果更可靠,食物图谱,食物成分,食物种类,中国营养学会,摄入量,参照体系,回顾性,南京医科大学公共卫生学院,成年居民,食物模型,<正>膳食调查所得到的摄入量数据是指导居民改善饮食营养和开展营养宣教的重要依据,也是政府决策、学术研究和新食品研https://read.cnki.net/web/Conference/Article/EGYN201609001031.html
6.卫生研究杂志中国疾病预防控制中心主办2020年第01期关键词:充足体力活动 高强度体力活动 体质指数 多水平模型 分位数回归 吉林省龙井市农村地区朝鲜族和汉族老年人膳食营养状况 关键词:老年人 食物频率法 膳食调查 汉族 朝鲜族 营养状况 2014-2018年安徽省部分豆类及豆制品中硼含量 关键词:硼 豆类 豆制品 违法添加 目的调查安徽省部分豆类及豆制品中硼本底含量https://www.youfabiao.com/wsyj/202001/
7.每日热点1103调查人员研究了去餐馆就餐与死亡风险之间的关系,研究表明,经常食用(每天两顿或更多)餐馆的食物与全因死亡的风险增加显著相关。 有证据表明,外出就餐往往能量密度、脂肪和钠含量较高,但水果、蔬菜、全谷类食品和膳食纤维和抗氧化剂等保护性营养素含量较低。 调查人员对35084名年龄大于等于20岁的成年人进行了面对面的家https://sccdc.cn/Article/View?id=30673
8.影响人群营养干预研究质量关键问题的专家意见中国食品核心提示:由中国营养学会基础营养学分会、中国营养学会营养与保健食品分会、中国营养保健食品协会保健食品研发专业委员会等权威学术团体,邀请来自于科研临床、公共卫生、标准研究等领域的专家以及行业相关单位共同成立了《食品营养临床试验质量管理规范(暂定名)》团体标准编写工作组(后简称“标准工作组”)。 https://news.foodmate.net/2024/05/688091.html